Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] clkdev: change prototype of clk_register_clkdev()

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Mon Feb 23 2015 - 07:03:45 EST


On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:53:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c | 9 +++++----
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 5 ++++-
> > arch/mips/ath79/clock.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/clk/clk-bcm2835.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c | 9 ++++-----
> > drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410-dclk.c | 19 +++++++++---------
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > include/linux/clkdev.h | 2 +-
> > 11 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> What's tying all of these changes together? It would be better
> (simpler for you) if you split them up by subsystem and resubmitted.

I think maybe, just maybe, you might get the answer to that if you read
the patch.

You can't change the function signature without creating lots of warnings
and causing regressions.

Yes, the function could be renamed whilst doing this change, but that's
really quite sub-standard in an already busy namespace.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/