Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] irqchip: Add DT binding doc for the virtual irq demuxer chip
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Feb 23 2015 - 19:39:41 EST
On Friday, February 20, 2015 10:31:44 AM Mark Rutland wrote:
> Given all of the above I'll go back to the IRQF_SHARED_TIMER_OK approach
> you proposed, along with documentation updates and comments at usage
> sites to make it clear when it is valid to use.
> Thank you for bearing with me so far.
No prob. :-)
Actually, there's one more approach possible. Thomas might not like it, but
here it goes anyway for consideration.
What about making it possible to provide a special irqaction to be called
while suspended for the shared IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupts.
Say we have a "suspended_action" pointer in struct irq_desc in addition to
"action" and we swap them in suspend_device_irq() if desc->no_suspend_depth is
nonzero and "suspended_action" is not NULL (and then back in resume_irq()).
Then, the platform might supply "suspended_action" that will do the right
thing for the IRQ.
So the requirement would be to have "suspended_action" set to start with
and then the WARN_ON() in irq_pm_install_action() may check if that is present
and only trigger the warning if it isn't.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/