Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/intel_rdt: Intel Cache Allocation Technology detection

From: Vikas Shivappa
Date: Thu Feb 26 2015 - 14:14:19 EST




On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:19:42AM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
This would be an indication that the System support RDT. On a system with
RDT would see a print.

intel_rdt: cbmlength: xx , CLOss:xx

Ok, so I have a capacity bitmask of length xx and yy classes of service.
And?

Are you expecting for tools or experienced users to grep dmesg to find
that information?

Uh, but what happens on a machine which has a small log buffer and which
has wrapped around and that information has been overwritten?

Yes, this is not the only way to see if the feature is enabled. It can be seen in cpuinfo like you mention below. The root's cbm mask represents the max cbm length already -
that can be seen by the user as defined in the documentation.
It is under consideration to add Max closids or something like clos ids available to be shown in the root cgroup once there are more resources and more such parameters required to be exposed to user. It would be easier to view the resources like CPUID availability through cgroup interface itself rather than add an other interface for the same.


See what I mean?

If you really want to communicate this information to someone, you
should use more robust methods like make userspace use CPUID directly or
expose that information in sysfs if CPUID is not an option (but I can't
imagine why it wouldn't be).

This flaky message which can get overwritten and gets used only by a
small percentage of people(?) (I haven't reached the part which tells
me the use cases for that resource management yet) is purely useless in
dmesg.

Even /proc/cpuinfo, which will have "rdt" et all in there according to
the defines you're adding, would be a much better way to detect what's
supported quickly than the message.

HTH.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/