Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
> this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
> existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.

Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/