Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Fri Feb 27 2015 - 17:42:29 EST


On 27/02/15 14:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800
>
>> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of
>> that change, would that be acceptable?
>
> I think it should go the other way around.

I was not quite sure whether Jaedon's change could be suitable for 'net'
considering how many lines of code it involved changing, but ok, that's
better that way.

>
> The bug should be fixed in 'net'.
>
> Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge
> 'net' into 'net-next'. It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change.
>

Sure.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/