Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/24] 3.2.68-rc1 review

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Mar 03 2015 - 21:09:54 EST


On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 17:01 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 02:11 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.68 release.
> > There are 24 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 05 23:30:00 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > A combined patch relative to 3.2.67 will be posted as an additional
> > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 98 pass: 95 fail: 3
> Failed builds:
> mips:allmodconfig
> xtensa:defconfig
> xtensa:allmodconfig
>
> Qemu tests:
> total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0
>
> Results are as expected.

Thanks for checking.

> >
> > David Daney (1):
> > MIPS: Fix C0_Pagegrain[IEC] support.
> > [9ead8632bbf454cfc709b6205dc9cd8582fb0d64]
> >
>
> This patch seems to be missing in your published patch list, though.

Yes, I removed that in between generating and sending the mbox. Nothing
to see here, move along...

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Horngren's Observation:
Among economists, the real world is often a special case.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part