Re: [PATCH 2/3] crypto: caam_rng: fix rng_unmap_ctx's DMA_UNMAP size problem

From: Kim Phillips
Date: Thu Mar 05 2015 - 19:33:40 EST


On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 10:52:37 +0800
yjin <yanjiang.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2015å03æ05æ 02:36, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:33:22 +0800
> > yjin <yanjiang.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2015å03æ04æ 03:31, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:50:52 +0800
> >>> <yanjiang.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> - dma_unmap_single(jrdev, ctx->sh_desc_dma, DESC_RNG_LEN,
> >>>> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>> + dma_unmap_single(jrdev, ctx->sh_desc_dma,
> >>>> + desc_bytes(ctx->sh_desc), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>> alignment: the 'd' in desc_bytes should fall directly under the 'j'
> >>> in jrdev.
> >>>
> >>> Also, DESC_RNG_LEN should be corrected to (4 * CAAM_CMD_SZ).
> >>
> >> I can't find the obvious limitation for the RNG descriptor length in
> >> Freescale documents, could you point out it?
> > ? rng_create_sh_desc() creates a fixed descriptor of exactly 4
> > command-lengths.
>
> Do you mean that the code itself limits the descriptor length? Not a
> hardware limitation.

the code writes descriptors such that they don't reach h/w
limitations.

> If so, I prefer to dma_unmap with desc_bytes(ctx->sh_desc) as my
> previous patch, and correct DESC_RNG_LEN to (4 * CAAM_CMD_SZ).

please.

Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/