Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc3

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Mar 09 2015 - 10:27:30 EST


Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> smc91x fallout. The lpd270_defconfig failure looks like not covered by
>> "ARM: fix typos in smc91x platform data" yet?
>
> It's not?
>
> This should be part of that patch:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/lpd270.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static struct resource smc91x_resources[] = {
> };
>
> struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_platdata = {
> - .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT;
> + .flags = SMC91X_USE_16BIT | SMC91X_NOWAIT,

Ah OK. Sorry, I thought there was a different reason.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/