Re: [PATCH] Avoid null-pointer access in w1/slaves/w1_therm
From: David Fries
Date: Mon Mar 09 2015 - 19:09:49 EST
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:47:24PM +0100, Thorsten Bschorr wrote:
> > Here's a different strategy, add a w1_therm family_data specific mutex
> > so w1_therm_remove_slave won't return while another thread is in
> > w1_slave_show. Thoughts?
> > I included three patches, the first is the proposed fix, the second
> > makes it more reproducible (and since my testing doesn't have external
> > power I had to ignore that check), the third is just some debugging
> > messages. For testing I'm starting a read from w1_slave then manually
> > remove the sensor, which seems to do the trick.
> I'll test your patch, but keeping the original sleep-time tm.
Oops, sorry, it got lost in the shuffle, here's the first patch again
(the others were for debugging and increase that time and so wouldn't
go upstream anyway).