[PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor

[Florian Westphal]

It is identical to the can destructor.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/can/skb.h | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/can/skb.h b/include/linux/can/skb.h
index cc00d15..b6a52a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/can/skb.h
+++ b/include/linux/can/skb.h
@@ -44,16 +44,11 @@ static inline void can_skb_reserve(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(struct can_skb_priv));
 }
 
-static inline void can_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-	sock_put(skb->sk);
-}
-
 static inline void can_skb_set_owner(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
 {
 	if (sk) {
 		sock_hold(sk);
-		skb->destructor = can_skb_destructor;
+		skb->destructor = sock_efree;
 		skb->sk = sk;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.0.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/