Re: [PATCH 00/19 v3] Add timekeeping tests to kernel selftest
From: John Stultz
Date: Wed Mar 11 2015 - 12:53:38 EST
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 02:09 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> I've hosted my timekeeping tests on github for the last few years:
>> but I suspect not too many folks have actually used them.
>> I've been meaning to get them reworked and submitted into the
>> selftest infrastructure, but haven't had much time until
>> I've added both the non-desctructive and destructive tests
>> (which set the time, possibly to strange values, or tries
>> to trigger historical issues that could crash the machine).
>> The destructive tests are run (as root, or with proper
>> privledge) via:
>> # make run_destructive_tests
>> Changes in v3:
>> * Lots of -Wall build warning fixups
>> * Handle the CROSS_COMPILER build variable properly
>> (Thanks to LinusW for pointing that out)
>> * Integrate w/ ksft_exit_* infrastructure
>> Let me know if there is any further comments or feedback!
> Ran into several checkpatch warnings when I tried to queue
> these up for 4.1. Could you please fix them and resend.
So the only few items I saw were:
1) Lines over 80 col, usually do to long string output
2) String output split over multiple lines (result of trying to fix #1
in a few spots)
- And here I did try to split the string sanely so I didn't break
up the messages, so they're still grepable
3) The extern char *optarg, warning. This one I can probably kill
since I'm including unistd.h.
I'll take a look at #3, but #1 and #2 are basically contrary at a
certain point. Or do you have other ideas for resolving those
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/