Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: drop bogus default values

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 12.03.15 at 13:11, <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Default "no" is pretty pointless for options without (visible) prompts:
> 
> Related: is there ever a situation where using "default n" or "def_bool
> n" makes sense (whether or not the entry has a prompt)? I think I once
> thought of one but I can't remember it at all, so I guess my memory is
> fooling me.

I can't see any, but since as long as there is a visible prompt this
doesn't have any other bad effect than bloating the Kconfig file
and making its parsing a tiny bit slower, I don't care that much
about those (originally I had started a patch removing those too,
but gave up after a while).

Jan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/