Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for Qualcomm HW, Mutex block
From: Tim Bird
Date: Thu Mar 12 2015 - 11:26:38 EST
On 03/12/2015 01:16 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:42:38PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
>>> I'm pretty anxious about this one, as my current work has a dependency on it.
>>> Virtually the entirety of the QualComm SOC work is dependent on this
>>> because it's needed by the interprocessor communication framework
>>> and the regulator driver.
>>> I assume we're waiting on the response from Ohad about getting this upstream?
>>> It's been almost 2 weeks with no reply.
>>> Ohad - do you plan to do anything with this patch? We seem to be at an impasse
>>> (once again).
>> With Suman's patches and this, the ball is in Ohad's court. I believe Ohad
>> does this work in his off time as it is unpaid work.
> I definitely plan to get this and Suman's work merged upstream.
> As Andy mentioned I'm doing this in my off time and unfortunately this
> means I'm sometimes less available than I wish I was. Not too long ago
> this activity (as well as the maintainership of remoteproc and rpmsg)
> was graciously sponsored by one of the silicon vendors but that is no
> longer the case.
> Anyway I plan to get to this in the weekend, hope to push things forward.
Thanks for the response. It's helpful to know your status.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/