Re: [RFC][PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Formalize Stephen Boyd as generic sched_clock maintainer
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Mar 12 2015 - 14:02:27 EST
On 03/12/15 09:56, John Stultz wrote:
> While I've been interested in the generic sched_clock work since
> it uses the clocksource infrastructure, Stephen has really done
> all the heavy lifting so far.
> So while I've been queuing and pushing changes through Thomas/Ingo,
> I'm not sure I have the bandwidth to do it justice. So it probably
> would be best in the future if Stephen pushed the changes himself
> to Thomas/Ingo to the -tip tree.
> Thus this patch marks Stephen explicitly as the maintainer, and
> leaves me and Daniel (due to his recent interest) as reviewers.
> I've still got some recent changes from Daniel queued for 4.1,
> which I'll send along to Ingo/Thomas soon. But I was hoping
> to add this to the end of that queue.
> Let me know if anyone has any objections or suggestions for
> other reviewers.
> PeterZ: I'd add you but I'm not sure if you care much about
> the generic stuff.
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/