Re: [PATCH 00/12] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups (v4)
From: John Stultz
Date: Fri Mar 13 2015 - 13:54:46 EST
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > * John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> New in v4:
>> >> * Lots and lots of typo corrections and minor cleanups suggested
>> >> by Ingo.
>> >> * Dropped "Remove clocksource_max_deferment()" patch
>> >> * Added "Rename __clocksource_updatefreq_*..." patch
>> >> * I realized one of the patches (Improve clocksource watchdog
>> >> reporting) didn't have a proper cc list, so while it was on lkml
>> >> folks may not have reviewed it before.
>> > So I've applied them with some changes to tip:timers/core, please look
>> > at the commit notifications for details. Any outstanding review
>> > feedback can be addressed as delta patches on top of this I think,
>> > none of my observations were show-stoppers.
>> Have you not yet pushed the changed out publicly? (I'm only seeing one
>> change from Viresh in tip/timers/core)
> Yeah, yesterday I had some test failures (elsewhere) so they were held
> I pushed them out a minute ago, the commit notifications should appear
Ok, just looked them over and your changes look good to me. Thanks for
I'll generate a few patches to address the other comments you made the
last cycle and send those to you in a bit.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/