Re: [rfc patch v2] rt,nohz_full: fix nohz_full for PREEMPT_RT_FULL

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

* Mike Galbraith | 2015-03-13 05:53:25 [+0100]:

>First of all, a task being ticked and trying to shut the tick down will
>fail to do so due to having just awakened ksoftirqd, so let ksoftirqd
>try to do that after SOFTIRQ_TIMER processing.  Secondly, should the
>tick be shut down, we may livelock in hrtimer-cancel() because in -rt
>a callback may be running.  Break the loop, and let tick_nohz_restart()
>know that the timer is busy so it can bail.

I am a bit undecided on that one. I included it in the series but did
not enable it yet.
Just so we are on the same page here: you boot your machine with
something like
    "isolcpus=1-31 rcu_nocbs=1-31 nohz_full=1-31"
and pin all kernel threads to CPU0, right?

What you do is that you accept the fact that the timer-softirq is
scheduled for no reason and then you try to disable the tick from within
the timer-softirq. I assumed that it would work get the "expired timer"
somehow.

>Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/