Re: [PATCH RFC] wimax/i2400m: fixup completion handling for resetting a device

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 3/17/2015 12:49 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:

> wait_for_completion_timeout return 0 (timeout) or >=1 (completion) so the check
> for > 0 in the else branch is always true and can be dropped. The comment seems
> misleading as it is always going to pass the result up.

> The sync of the completion access with __i2400m_dev_reset_handle (which checks
> for   if (i2400m->reset_ctx)   could race if i2400m_reset() returns negative so
> the resetting of i2400m->reset_ctx == NULL is moved to the out: path.

> As wait_for_completion_timeout returns unsigned long not int, an appropriately
> named variable of type unsigned long is added and assignments fixed up.

   Don't try to do several things in one patch.

> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>

[...]

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/