Re: [PATCH] scsi: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type

From: Vasu Dev
Date: Wed Mar 18 2015 - 13:33:46 EST


On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 07:57 -0400, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> wait_for_completion_timeout returns unsigned long not int. As other
> instances of wait_for_completion_timeout in fc_fcp.c use ticks_left
> of appropriate type, this name is used here as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Patch was only compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + SCSI_LOWLEVEL=y
> CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS=m, CONFIG_LIBFC=m
>
> Patch is against 4.0-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20150310)
>
> drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
> index c679594..c94a518 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ static void fc_lun_reset_send(unsigned long data)
> static int fc_lun_reset(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_fcp_pkt *fsp,
> unsigned int id, unsigned int lun)
> {
> - int rc;
> + unsigned long ticks_left;
>
> fsp->cdb_cmd.fc_dl = htonl(fsp->data_len);
> fsp->cdb_cmd.fc_tm_flags = FCP_TMF_LUN_RESET;
> @@ -1276,7 +1276,8 @@ static int fc_lun_reset(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_fcp_pkt *fsp,
> * wait for completion of reset
> * after that make sure all commands are terminated
> */
> - rc = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsp->tm_done, FC_SCSI_TM_TOV);
> + ticks_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsp->tm_done,
> + FC_SCSI_TM_TOV);
>
> spin_lock_bh(&fsp->scsi_pkt_lock);
> fsp->state |= FC_SRB_COMPL;
> @@ -1292,7 +1293,7 @@ static int fc_lun_reset(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_fcp_pkt *fsp,
> fsp->wait_for_comp = 0;
> spin_unlock_bh(&fsp->scsi_pkt_lock);
>
> - if (!rc) {
> + if (!ticks_left) {
> FC_SCSI_DBG(lport, "lun reset failed\n");
> return FAILED;
> }


Looks good.

Acked-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/