Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: add a is_e820_ram() helper

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:04:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yeah, the code is much clearer now:
> > 
> >   Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > What tree is this intended for? Should I pick up the x86 bits?
> 
> The x86 bits really need to go through the x86 tree.  The pmem 
> driver itself would normally go through the block tree, but if Jens 
> is fine with it sending it through the x86 tree as well would allow 
> us to have a single complete tree for testing.

btw., there's half a dozen block drivers in arch/* platform code, so 
in theory even the block driver could be merged there - but I agree 
that it's much cleaner and more generic in drivers/block/.

Jens?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/