Re: [PATCH 0/7] minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver

[Hanjun Guo]

Hi Will,

On 2015å03æ27æ 22:03, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hanjun,
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 01:55:04PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > This patch set are some minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver
> > to address the comments which raised by Rafael in ARM64 ACPI core
> > patches, so this patch set is on top of ARM64 ACPI core patches
> > the git tree is
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > branch for-next/acpi.
> >
> > Rafael, I assume this patchset will be taken with your tree if
> > it makes sense, any rebase work needed please let me know.
> >
> > the last patch - ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid()
> > will cut u64 mpidr to int, but I think it is ok for error values,
> > correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> I appreciate that you probably have a bunch of code building on top of
> the series that's in linux-next, but sending it out at the moment is
> hugely confusing -- particularly when this is targetting an independent
> tree. If you have patches for 4.2, please can you wait until after the
> merge window before posting for review?

OK, thanks for the reminding, I didn't mean any confusion but actually
I did, sorry for that.

> Right now most maintainers are probably trying to stabilise their current
> queues, so the most helpful thing you can do is test linux-next and send
> fixes for any issues you find there.

Sure, I will test linux-next on ARM64 platforms and x86 too.

> It doesn't help that the series you posted seems to include two patch
> series (n/7 and n/2).

oh, side effects of staying up all night for the firmware mini-summit,
please take those two patches for ARM64 ACPI if it is OK to you.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/