[PATCH 1/6] SQUASHME: Don't let e820_PMEM sections

[Boaz Harrosh]

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

If we need a NUMA crossing a mids a contiguous memory range
we split the range at NUMA boundary so to produce two pmemX
devices. We do not like 2 NUMA IDs at the same device.

TODO: What happens with real type-12 NvDIMM the BIOS splits
these ranges?

Christoph I please need this patch for now. I have booting
problems on some machines, when a contiguous pmem range crosses
a NUMA boundary.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 4bd525a..a098c74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ int __init sanitize_e820_map(struct e820entry *biosmap, int max_nr_map,
 		 * continue building up new bios map based on this
 		 * information
 		 */
-		if (current_type != last_type)	{
+		if (current_type != last_type || current_type == E820_PRAM) {
 			if (last_type != 0)	 {
 				new_bios[new_bios_entry].size =
 					change_point[chgidx]->addr - last_addr;
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/