Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Fri Apr 03 2015 - 14:17:29 EST
> While thinking about it (and I still think of it as a 'big issue'
> compared to the intention of the initial patch) I came to the
> conclusion that I should maybe just go for a board-specific
> i2c-mux-pinctrl node instead of adding it to the SoC dtsi. That will
> also avoid doubled i2c busses on boards with just the default i2c
> option.
Ehrm, then please let me know what you decided on. If you chose the
above road, then I don't need to think about the other questions :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature