Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] serial: stm32-usart: Add STM32 USART Driver

From: Maxime Coquelin
Date: Tue Apr 07 2015 - 12:06:01 EST


2015-04-04 0:04 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This drivers adds support to the STM32 USART controller, which is a
>> standard serial driver.
>>
>
> Few minor comments.
>
>> Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig | 17 +
>> drivers/tty/serial/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c | 736 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h | 3 +
>> 4 files changed, 757 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>>

>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..61e0e19
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,736 @@
...
>> +
>> +static unsigned int stm32_get_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + /* This routine is used to get signals of: DCD, DSR, RI, and CTS */
>> + return TIOCM_CAR | TIOCM_DSR | TIOCM_CTS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Transmit stop */
>> +static void stm32_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + stm32_clr_bits(port, USART_CR1, USART_CR1_TXEIE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>
> Unneeded empty line.
Right, will be removed.

>
...
>> +
>> +static int stm32_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + const char *name = to_platform_device(port->dev)->name;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + if (request_irq(port->irq, stm32_interrupt, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
>> + name, port)) {
>
> I think you have to propogate returned value, thus
> ret = request_irq();
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
Exact, I will fix this.

>
...
>> +
>> +static const char *stm32_type(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + return (port->type == PORT_STM32) ? DRIVER_NAME : NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> +}
>
> Doesn't core handle NULL-functions? If it does, remove such from the driver.
No it does not.

>
>> +
>> +static int stm32_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Ditto.
Ditto.

Thanks for the review,
Maxime

>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/