Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] rbtree: Implement generic latch_tree

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thu Apr 09 2015 - 13:12:16 EST

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was a little surprised myself it worked, but its a constant after
> all so it 'should'.

Well, it should actually work for non-constants too, even when that
'idx' isn't inlined to one of the fixed constants. So even if this
will ever hit the "seq & 1" case for lookup, it should all work. It's
just an expression, after all.

All that is really required is that you can do '&(x->y)' on it, where
'x' is the type, and 'y' is the "member".

It's just unusual, which I think makes it slightly harder to read for
a *human* just because it breaks the normal pattern of those things.
But there's nothing technically wrong with it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at