Re: [PATCH 07/13] x86/microcode/intel: Rename update_match_revision()

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:54:56PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> BTW, I could not find that the 'rev' argument to get_matching_sig() was
> used at all..

That's the next patch in the queue  for 4.2 :-)

> If we're to rename 'rev', maybe calling it 'cpu_rev' would make it more
> obvious where this variable is coming from?

It is actually a microcode revision. I.e., microcode patch version
number. I'll add doc comments after the cleanup is done.

> Anyway you patch looks good to me!

Thanks, I'll add your ACK.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/