Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink_log proc file
From: David Miller
Date: Fri Apr 10 2015 - 15:31:39 EST
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:31:19 +0200
> Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches:
>> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use
>>> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values.
>> Hey Richard.
>> Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next
>> as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses.
>> Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next?
> Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened
> because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already.
> Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used
> git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old
> branch were taken.
I'm waiting for you to respin this series against net-next, thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/