RE: [PATCH v3 07/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-ulp ipoib

From: Hefty, Sean
Date: Tue Apr 14 2015 - 13:10:13 EST

> But that moves us in the wrong direction. If we later support port 2
> without
> port 1 that code will be broken.

I agree that the code will be broken, but supporting that model requires a lot more work in how the ib_cm listens across devices.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at