Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Apr 24 2015 - 09:47:04 EST
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/04/15 16:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Fri 2015-04-10 12:35:52, Archit Taneja wrote:
>>>> That said, if the fb is in RAM, and is only written by the CPU, I think
>>>> a normal memcpy() for fb_memcpy_fromfb() should be fine...
>>> I didn't test for performance regressions when I posted this patch.
>>> A look at _memcpy_fromio in arch/arm/kernel/io.c shows that readb() is used
>>> all the time, even when the source and destination addresses are aligned for
>>> larger reads to be possible. Other archs seem to use readl() or readq() when
>>> they can. Maybe that makes memcpy_fromio slower than the implementation of
>>> memcpy on arm?
>> Ok, can you prepare a patch for me to try? Or should we just revert
>> the original commit?
> The old way worked fine, afaik, so maybe we can revert. But still, isn't
> it more correct to use memcpy_fromio? It's (possibly) io memory we have
Yes it is.
So please optimize ARM's _memcpy_fromio(), _memcpy_toio(), and _memset_io().
That will benefit other drivers on ARM, too.
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/