Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog_cpumask sysctl to assist nohz
From: Ulrich Obergfell
Date: Sat Apr 25 2015 - 11:43:58 EST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Zickus" <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:07:00AM -0400, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
>> I think the user should only be allowed to specify a mask that is a subset of
>> tick_nohz_full_mask as only those CPUs don't have a watchdog thread by default.
>> In other words, the user should not be able to interfere with housekeeping CPUs.
> Hi Uli,
> I am not sure that is necessary. This was supposed to be a debugging
> interface for nohz (and possibly other technologies). I think restricting
> it to just tick_nohz makes it difficult to try out new things or debug
> certain problems.
> Personally, I feel anyone who will use this sys interface will need to do so
> at their own risk.
Don, o.k. - I understand.
Chris, please ignore my idea to add a plausibility check.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/