Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: arm64: guest debug, add SW break point support
From: Alex BennÃe
Date: Tue Apr 28 2015 - 04:42:33 EST
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 27 April 2015 at 21:04, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Alex BennÃe wrote:
>>> Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:08:04PM +0100, Alex BennÃe wrote:
>>> >> + * just need to report the PC and the HSR values to userspace.
>>> >> + * Userspace may decide to re-inject the exception and deliver it to
>>> >> + * the guest if it wasn't for the host to deal with.
>>> > now I'm confused - does userspace setup the guest to receive an
>>> > exception or does it tell KVM to emulate an exception for the guest or
>>> > do we execute the breakpoint without trapping the debug exception?
>>> I've made it all go through userspace as we may have to translate the
>>> hypervisor visible exception code to what the guest was expecting to see.
>> ok, so I think you should re-phrase something like:
>> "Userspace may decide that this exception is caused by the guest using
>> debugging itself, and may in that case emulate the guest debug exception
>> in userspace before resuming KVM."
>> But does that really work? Given that we don't support KVM-TCG
>> migration, this sounds a little strange. Did we test it?
> The QEMU patches have a TODO note at the point where you'd want
> to do this... Design-wise you can do the reinjection in the
> kernel or in userspace (ppc QEMU does this in userspace, for
> instance) because it's pretty much just setting registers to fake
> up the exception-entry into EL1. Code-wise QEMU's ARM code isn't
> set up to do it right now, but it shouldn't be too difficult to
> persuade the TCG exception-entry code to work for this case too.
> Does the kernel already have a conveniently implemented "inject
> exception into guest" lump of code? If so it might be less effort
> to do it that way round, maybe.
So you pointed out we can't just re-inject the exceptions we get as we
need to map from things like ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_LOW to
ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_CUR before re-injection.
Of course if it is as simple as modifying the ESR_EL1 register and
returning +ve in the handle_exit path then I can do that but I assumed
if any other wrangling needs doing it should be done in userspace.
> -- PMM
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/