Re: Should mmap MAP_LOCKED fail if mm_poppulate fails?
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue Apr 28 2015 - 14:35:44 EST
On Tue 28-04-15 09:57:11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hmm, no other thread has the address from the current mmap call except
> > for MAP_FIXED (more on that below).
> With things like opportunistic SIGSEGV handlers that map/unmap things
> as the user takes faults, that's actually not at all guaranteed.
> Yeah, it's unusual, but I've seen it, with threaded applications where
> people play games with user-space memory management, and do "demand
> allocation" with mmap() in response to signals.
I am still not sure I see the problem here. Let's say we have a
userspace page fault handler which would do mmap(fault_addr, MAP_FIXED),
If we had a racy mmap(NULL, MAP_LOCKED) that could have mapped
fault_addr by the time handler does its work then this is buggy wrt. to
MAP_LOCKED semantic because the fault handler would discard the locked
part. This wouldn't lead to a data loss but still makes MAP_LOCKED usage
If the racing thread did mmap(around_fault_addr, MAP_FIXED|MAP_LOCKED)
then it would be broken as well, and even worse I would say, because the
original fault could have been discarded and data lost.
I would expect that user fault handlers would be synchronized with
other mmap activity otherwise I have hard time to see how this can all
have a well defined behavior. Especially when MAP_FIXED is involved.
> Admittedly we already do bad things in mmap(MAP_FIXED) for that case,
> since we dropped the vm lock. But at least it shouldn't be any worse
> than a thread speculatively touching the pages..
Actually we already allow to mmap(MAP_FIXED) to fail after
discarding an existing mmaped area (see mmap_region and e.g.
security_vm_enough_memory_mm or other failure cases).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/