Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Don't return error on nested bitmap memory allocation failure
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 12:40:10 EST
On 29/04/2015 18:08, Bandan Das wrote:
>>>> >> > Yeah... I hear you. Ok, let me put it this way - Assume that we can
>>>> >> > defer this allocation up until the point that the nested subsystem is
>>>> >> > actually used i.e L1 tries running a guest and we try to allocate this
>>>> >> > area. If get_free_page() failed in that case, would we still want to
>>>> >> > kill L1 too ? I guess no.
>>> >> We could block the hypervisor thread on the allocation, just like it
>>> >> would block on faults for swapped out pages or new ones that have to be
>>> >> reclaimed from the page cache first.
> So, block on a failure hoping that eventually it will succeed ?
>> > In that case we should avoid making the allocation GFP_ATOMIC to begin with.
>> > If a GFP_KERNEL allocation failed, returning -ENOMEM from KVM_RUN (which
>> > practically means killing the guest) would actually be a very real
>> > possibility.
> Sorry Paolo, I missed your point. Isn't the allocation already GFP_KERNEL ?
I mean if it were done lazily as in your thought-experiment. Then:
- a GFP_ATOMIC allocation would be bad
- a GFP_KERNEL allocation would block like Jan said; if it failed, I
would be okay with returning -ENOMEM to userspace, even if that in
practice means killing the guest.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/