On 29/04/15 17:54, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 04/29/2015 12:32 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 28/04/15 19:29, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:But then (at least in 2-level case) more than one VCPUs may pick the
On 04/28/2015 12:28 PM, David Vrabel wrote:Perhaps evtchn_2l_resume() should set the local cpu mask for any bound
From the commit log the evtchn_2l_resume() fucntion that's addedIt in fact makes this problem worse since now that cpu_evtchn_mask is
like it fixes the problem on its own?
cleared during resume we cannot process the interrupt anymore in
evtchn_2l_handle_events(): irqs have to be bound to a cpu in order for
an interrupt to be processed.
event channels? And then you wouldn't need IRQ_MOVE_PCNTX.
same interrupt, won't they? Because the local cpu mask is what tells a
VCPU that it is allowed to claim an interrupt.
We know that all event channels at this point are on VCPU0 (right?) so
we only set the bit in that VCPU's mask.