Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce binding for always-on clock support
From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 16:30:10 EST
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse
> > > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then
> > > they have no foundation for recourse.
> > >
> > > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker?
> > Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl,
> > to make people aware they should think twice?
> That's a really nice idea!
> Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)?
Do whatever you want.
This binding is going to be merged no matter what, so my opinion has
really little value here.
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
Description: Digital signature