Re: Module stacking next steps

From: John Johansen
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 22:45:58 EST

On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
>> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
>> procedure would you like to follow?
> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
> Any objections or concerns?
No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
this land.

I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at