Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace mm_page_pcpu_drain on offline cpus

From: Shreyas B Prabhu
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 00:42:39 EST

On Thursday 30 April 2015 10:06 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Shreyas B Prabhu
> <shreyas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 10:38 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> I am not sure if its worth the effort now. It doesn't look like any
>>>> other trace point apart from the above use case will benefit from it.
>>>> Only smbus_write and smbus_reply seem to come close. But even they need
>>>> separate TP_fast_assign.
>>> It shouldn't be a problem to implement. But I'm currently cleaning up
>>> those files, and any changes will cause nasty conflicts.
>>> Lets do this. Push the current changes as is, and when I get around to
>>> adding a DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT_CONDITION(), we can modify that code to use
>>> it.
>> Okay, sure.
> Looks good then.
> Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks a lot!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at