Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 08:07:33 EST

On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 04:14 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Lovely sounding argument, but it is wrong because Tux3 still beats XFS
> even with seek time factored out of the equation.

Hm. Do you have big-storage comparison numbers to back that? I'm no
storage guy (waiting for holographic crystal arrays to obsolete all this
crap;), but Dave's big-storage guy words made sense to me.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at