Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/5] clk: add missing lock when call clk_core_enable in clk_set_parent
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 15:07:57 EST
On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> clk_core_enable is executed without &enable_clock in clk_set_parent function.
> Adding it to avoid potential race condition issue.
> Fixes: 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances")
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Can you please describe the race condition? From what I can tell there
is not a race condition here and we've gone around on this part of the
code before to fix any race conditions.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/