Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] ACPI / processor: always compile perflib if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR

From: Ashwin Chaugule
Date: Wed May 06 2015 - 14:36:45 EST


Hello,

On 6 May 2015 at 10:31, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Similar to the idle, thermal and throttling libraries, always compile
> the perflib if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled. This not only makes
> perflib alligned with other libraries but also helps in some sanity
> testing of these ACPI methods even when a particular feature is not
> enabled in the kernel configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +-
> include/acpi/processor.h | 29 -----------------------------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index 8a063e276530..33aef9d8b260 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT) += bgrt.o
> # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
> processor-y := processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o
> processor-y += processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o
> -processor-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += processor_perflib.o
> +processor-y += processor_perflib.o

I'd prefer that we create a separate kconfig option for this. (perhaps
even default it to 'y'). This library is quite specific to a certain
type of CPU performance management methods (includes _PSS and friends)
which are superseded by CPPC. The OS is not expected to support both
at runtime, so by keeping this a config option, we can then disable it
at compile time when CPPC is enabled. We could couple
processor_throttling, thermal and perflib under this config option
(CONFIG_PSS ?) since they're all under the same CPU performance
management umbrella. Thoughts?

Regards,
Ashwin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/