Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 7 May 2015 01:12:07 +0000
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:14:27PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> > Hi Naoya,
> > 
> > Could you help to review and applied this series if possible.
> 
> Sorry for late response, I was offline for several days due to national
> holidays.
> 
> This patchset is good to me, but I'm not sure which path it should go through.
> Ordinarily, memory-failure patches go to linux-mm, but patch 3 depends on
> TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM patches, so this can go to linux-next directly, or go to
> linux-mm with depending patches.
> 
> Steven, Andrew, which way do you like?
> 

The TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() patch set went into the 4.1 merge window. It
should be fine to base off of any of Linus's tags after or including
4.1-rc1.

I need to start converting other trace events for 4.2.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/