[PATCH 6/6] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/preempt.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 4057696..a1a00e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
  * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
  * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
  */
-#define in_atomic()	((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
+#define in_atomic()	(preempt_count() != 0)
 
 /*
  * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/