[ 18/48] isofs: Fix unchecked printing of ER records

From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Fri May 15 2015 - 04:19:15 EST


2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

commit 4e2024624e678f0ebb916e6192bd23c1f9fdf696 upstream

We didn't check length of rock ridge ER records before printing them.
Thus corrupted isofs image can cause us to access and print some memory
behind the buffer with obvious consequences.

Reported-and-tested-by: Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
---
fs/isofs/rock.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/isofs/rock.c b/fs/isofs/rock.c
index 69c737d..2ec72ae 100644
--- a/fs/isofs/rock.c
+++ b/fs/isofs/rock.c
@@ -363,6 +363,9 @@ repeat:
rs.cont_size = isonum_733(rr->u.CE.size);
break;
case SIG('E', 'R'):
+ /* Invalid length of ER tag id? */
+ if (rr->u.ER.len_id + offsetof(struct rock_ridge, u.ER.data) > rr->len)
+ goto out;
ISOFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_rock = 1;
printk(KERN_DEBUG "ISO 9660 Extensions: ");
{
--
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/