Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2 03/20] nd_acpi, nfit-test: manufactured NFITs for interface development

From: Dan Williams
Date: Fri May 15 2015 - 16:50:41 EST


On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> +config NFIT_TEST
>> + tristate "NFIT TEST: Manufactured NFIT for interface testing"
>> + depends on DMA_CMA
>> + depends on LIBND=m
>> + depends on ND_ACPI
>> + depends on m
>> + help
>> + For development purposes register a manufactured
>> + NFIT table to verify the resulting device model topology.
>> + Note, this module arranges for ioremap_cache() to be
>> + overridden locally to allow simulation of system-memory as an
>> + io-memory-resource.
>> +
>> + Note, this test expects to be able to find at least 256MB of
>> + CMA space (CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES, cma=) or it will fail to
>> + load.
>> +
>> + Say N unless you are doing development of the 'nd' subsystem.
>> +
>
> Too many TLAs. I'm guessing CMA means Conventional Memory Area to you.
> To me it means contiguous memory allocator.

I means Contiguous Memory Allocator to me too.

> Anyway, please define
> acronyms when you use them, especially in help text. The help text also
> doesn't really explain where it will find this memory. Would it be
> possible to provide more direction there?

I didn't think I needed to define CMA in the context of Kconfig, but
I'll replace it with CONFIG_DMA_CMA to be more clear.

> I don't have any useful commentary on the patch itself. I do wonder if
> you shouldn't move this to the end, as it's hardly an integral part of
> the patch set.

True. The patches are currently in "development order" in that I
created the test infrastructure before the rest of the implementation.
But, I agree it makes sense to move this to the end for the next
posting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/