Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix dwarf-aux.c compilation on i386

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:20:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, May 16, 2015 at 08:21:49AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:59:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, May 15, 2015 at 06:23:11PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Replacing %lu format strings for Dwarf_Addr type with PRIu64 as it
> > > > fits for Dwarf_Addr (defined as uint64_t) type and works also on
> > > > both 32/64 bits.
> 
> > > 	Please try to always indicate against which branch your patches
> > > should be applied, be it as [PATCH perf/core], [PATCH perf/urgent] for
> > > isolated patches, or on the cover letter [GIT PULL 0/N perf/core], or as
> > > I do with Ingo, "[GIT PULL] perf/core fixes".
> 
> > > 	I thought, for this one, hey, its a fix, should go soon to Ingo!
> > > Tried to apply to perf/urgent, and it didn't apply :-\
> 
> > > 	Applying to perf/core instead now.
>  
> > hum, I've never rebased against perf/urgent, I'll try
> > to squeeze it in next time ;-)
> 
> In general, if it is a fix, try to check if it should be applied to
> perf/urgent first, if that is not the case, then it is fixing a bug
> introduced in perf/core, where it should go.
> 
> If you don't make it clear where to apply, then the burden is on me to
> check, if I have to do it for everybody... it doesn't scale :-)

ok, will try to do it next time

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/