Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in subsys_initcall

[David Cohen]

Hi,

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:07:05AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Many drivers and modules depend on ULPI bus registeration to
> register ULPI interfaces and drivers. It's more appropriate
> to register ULPI bus in subsys_initcall instead of module_init.
> 
> Kernel panic has been reported with some kind of kernel config.

Even though I agree subsys_initcall is better to register ulpi bus, it's
still no excuse to have kernel panic. What about ULPI bus being compiled
as module?
IMHO this is avoiding the proper kernel panic fix which should be
failing gracefully (or defer probe) from tusb1210 driver.

Br, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/