Re: [EDT][PATCH 1/1] dma/pl330.c : Initialize pl330 pointer after NULL check of pch pointer

From: Maninder Singh
Date: Thu May 21 2015 - 23:19:24 EST


EP-AA9D1F29B02341529D96C06444D8471D
Hi Vinod

>On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:00:27AM +0000, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> EP-AA9D1F29B02341529D96C06444D8471D
>Whats this, please sned patch ina proper format, git format-patch is your
>friend, use it
>

This is auto generated no. from editor, so please ignore it, and i am resubmitting the patch, thanks for your feedback.

>>
>> Hi,
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] dma/pl330.c : Initialize pl330 pointer after NULL check of pch pointer
>patch title doesn't match expectations, use the right subsystem name, and
>also please explain why yoy are doing this

Ok according to comments resubmitting . Please check new patch if it is appropriate. because this patch is also generated by git,
But i think editor does some malfunctioning.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-By: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 4 +++-
---cut---
>> Thanks
>> Maninder Singh
>Nice signature!
>
>--
>~Vinod

From 76a6ef435065c10a0476038e8a08016878488dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:53:11 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] dmaengine: pl330: Initialize pl330 for pl330_prep_dma_memcpy after NULL check of pch

Currently pch pointer is already dereferenced before NULL check and thus we are getting below warning:
warn: variable dereferenced before check 'pch'

So initialize struct pl330_dmac *pl330 after NULL check of dma_pl330_chan *pch.

Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
index a7d9d30..7e27144 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
@@ -2581,12 +2581,14 @@ pl330_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst,
{
struct dma_pl330_desc *desc;
struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = to_pchan(chan);
- struct pl330_dmac *pl330 = pch->dmac;
+ struct pl330_dmac *pl330;
int burst;

if (unlikely(!pch || !len))
return NULL;

+ pl330 = pch->dmac;
+
desc = __pl330_prep_dma_memcpy(pch, dst, src, len);
if (!desc)
return NULL;
--
1.7.1

Thanks
Maninder
............
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶Ç§vØ^–)Þº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü¨}©ž²Æ zÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ߢf”ù^jÇ«y§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ 0¶ìh®å’i