[PATCH v2] timekeeping: always make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't positive

From: Wang YanQing
Date: Sun May 31 2015 - 02:08:42 EST


I meet two issues on an IMX6 development board without enable
RTC device(so timekeeping_init will initialize the boot time
and monotonic to 0).

Issue 1:exportfs -a generate:
"exportfs: /opt/nfs/arm does not support NFS export"
Issue 2:cat /proc/stat:
"btime 4294967236"

Exact reproduction of the same issues on x86 after run below
code:
" int main(void)
{
struct timeval val;
int ret;

val.tv_sec = 0;
val.tv_usec = 0;
ret = settimeofday(&val, NULL);
return 0;
}
"
Reason:
The reason is positive wall_to_monotonic push boot time back to the time
before Epoch, getboottime will return negative value.

In issue 1:
negative boot time cause get_expiry overflow time_t when input expire
time is 2147483647, then cache_flush always clear entries just added
in ip_map_parse.
In issue 2:
show_stat use "unsigned long" to print
negative value return by getboottime.

This patch fix these two issues.

Note: this patch will cause we can't use settimeofday with time
earlier than current time on system which timekeeping_init
initialize the xtime, boot and monotonic to 0 before set
current time to a more reasonable time point.

Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes v1-v2:
1: fix subject, use "isn't positive" instead of "is negative".
2: rewrite changelog.
3: simplify code as suggested by John Stultz.

It really take me some times to realize how stupid and
buggy the version 1 patch is, but I am ready to be told
this version is even stupider:)

Thanks.

kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 0d784b3..b501aa6 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
struct timespec64 ts_delta, xt;
unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;

if (!timespec64_valid_strict(ts))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -908,10 +909,15 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;

+ if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec64_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, ts_delta));

tk_set_xtime(tk, ts);
-
+out:
timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);

write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
@@ -920,7 +926,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
/* signal hrtimers about time change */
clock_was_set();

- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday64);

@@ -949,7 +955,8 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)

/* Make sure the proposed value is valid */
tmp = timespec64_add(tk_xtime(tk), ts64);
- if (!timespec64_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
+ if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts64) > 0 ||
+ !timespec64_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto error;
}
--
1.8.5.6.2.g3d8a54e.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/