Re: [PATCH 10/15] KVM: MTRR: sort variable MTRRs

From: Xiao Guangrong
Date: Tue Jun 02 2015 - 22:35:27 EST




On 06/01/2015 05:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:


On 30/05/2015 12:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Sort all valid variable MTRRs based on its base address, it will help us to
check a range to see if it's fully contained in variable MTRRs

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f3fc152..5be8f2e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ enum {
struct kvm_mtrr_range {
u64 base;
u64 mask;
+ struct list_head node;
};

struct kvm_mtrr {
@@ -362,6 +363,8 @@ struct kvm_mtrr {
unsigned mtrr_enabled:1;
};
};
+
+ struct list_head head;
};

struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
index aeb9767..8e3b81a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c
@@ -262,6 +262,38 @@ do_zap:
kvm_zap_gfn_range(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(start), gpa_to_gfn(end));
}

+static bool var_mtrr_range_is_valid(struct kvm_mtrr_range *range)
+{
+ u64 start, end;
+
+ if (!(range->mask & (1 << 11)))
+ return false;
+
+ var_mtrr_range(range, &start, &end);
+ return end > start;
+}
+
+static void set_var_mtrr_start(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state, int index)
+{
+ /* remove the entry if it's in the list. */
+ if (var_mtrr_range_is_valid(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index]))
+ list_del(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index].node);
+}
+
+static void set_var_mtrr_end(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state, int index)
+{
+ struct kvm_mtrr_range *tmp, *cur = &mtrr_state->var_ranges[index];
+
+ /* add it to the list if it's valid. */
+ if (var_mtrr_range_is_valid(&mtrr_state->var_ranges[index])) {
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &mtrr_state->head, node)
+ if (cur->base < tmp->base)
+ list_add_tail(&cur->node, &tmp->node);
+
+ list_add_tail(&cur->node, &mtrr_state->head);
+ }
+}
+
int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)
{
int index;
@@ -281,10 +313,12 @@ int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data)

index = (msr - 0x200) / 2;
is_mtrr_mask = msr - 0x200 - 2 * index;
+ set_var_mtrr_start(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state, index);
if (!is_mtrr_mask)
vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.var_ranges[index].base = data;
else
vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.var_ranges[index].mask = data;
+ set_var_mtrr_end(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state, index);

Just move the whole code to a new kvm_set_var_mtrr function.

Okay.


}

update_mtrr(vcpu, msr);
@@ -331,6 +365,11 @@ int kvm_mtrr_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
return 0;
}

+void kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcpu->arch.mtrr_state.head);
+}
+
u8 kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state = &vcpu->arch.mtrr_state;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 64c2891..8084ac3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6991,7 +6991,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_vcpu_reset(vcpu, false);
kvm_mmu_setup(vcpu);
vcpu_put(vcpu);
-
+ kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);

Please move this call much earlier.

Okay, will do these in v2.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/