Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] x86/entry: Create a home for the x86 entry code in arch/x86/entry/

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I like the patch set (and you can add my Acked-by:) *except* 7/7, and the reason
>> >> for that is that it really isn't entry code, it is user space code.
>> >
>> > Well, I think arch/x86/entry/ should be a broader category for all things entry
>> > code: and the vsyscall code is closely related to the syscall entry/exit code so
>> > it's in a better place there than just being in the generic arch/x86/kernel/
>> > directory.
>> >
>> > I kept it separate in arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/ so it doesn't mix with other entry
>> > code.
>>
>> ...and my reading comprehension is way off this morning.  You already called it
>> arch/x86/entry, so there was no reason for me to suggest that :)
>>
>> Anyway, arch/x86/entry/vdso isn't so bad.  It's just a bit odd sounding to me.
>
> We could make it arch/x86/sys/? Sounds a bit too generic though.
>
> Didn't want to limit it to system calls only, because there's various other entry
> methods (irqs, traps, NMI, etc.) that we want to handle in a coherent fashion.
> [ Which you are intimately aware of ;-) ]
>

I'm convinced.  If "entry" means entry into code provided by the
kernel as opposed to entry via hardware-provided entry mechanism, then
the vdso is indeed a pile of entries into the kernel.

--Andy

> Thanks,
>
>         Ingo



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/