[PATCH v5 0/2] Implement SoC bus support for Vybrid
From: Sanchayan Maity
Date: Fri Jun 05 2015 - 05:25:30 EST
Hello,
This patchset implements SoC bus support for Freescale Vybrid platform,
implementing the following
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-soc
and is the fifth revision. Tested on a Colibri VF61 module after
rebasing on shawn's for-next branch.
Arnd and Shawn I did like to have your comments to get this in a
mergeable state and make any changes as necessary and required.
Thanks for the comments and feedback till now. Feedback is most
welcome.
Version 4 of the patchset can be found here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/26/199
Version 3 of the patchset can be found here
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg420847.html
Version 2 of the patchset can be found here
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg80654.html
Version 1 of the patchset can be found here
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg80257.html
The RFC version can be found here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/11/13
Changes since v4:
- Use devm_* family of functions and use a struct to get rid of
global variables (suggested by Joachim Eastwood)
- Make Kconfig govern the compilation with tristate, instead of
earlier bool. Paul Bolle raised a valid point that perhaps this
should have been built in with the bool, however I had not taken
into consideration generic distro kernels and it makes sense to
have this tristated. (comments from Paul Bolle and Andreas Farber)
Changes since v3:
- Instead of using the syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible function
use a phandle in the device tree along with offsets specified in
this phandle node and then read the offset along with the device
node in the driver for reading from the required region.
Changes since v2:
- Implement the SoC bus code as a driver in drivers/soc
by registering with fsl,mscm-cpucfg as per Arnd's feedback
Changes since v1:
- Sort the headers in alphabetical order
Changes since RFC:
- Use a DT entry for the ROM area while specifying it as syscon.
Notes same since v1:
Currently the required information is more or less read across the whole
SoC, but I guess we cannot change that since these are the locations
with the required information.
There seem to be three options for the revision field:
- ROM revision (see https://community.freescale.com/docs/DOC-94802)
- ANADIG revision (ANADIG_DIGIPROC, as used for the i.MX SoC's)
- OCOTP revision
Some numbers:
Colibri VF61 1.1A (2N02G)
- 0x00000013
- 0x00610000
- 0x01000000
- 0x410000c8
Colibri VF61 V1.0B (1N02G)
- 0x00000011
- 0x00610000
- 0x01000000
- 0x410000c8
Colibri VF61 V1.0A (which is actually a VF600 SoC, no L2 cache, since
that was the only one we could buy back then, 1N02G printed on it)
- 0x00000011
- 0x00610000
- 0x01000000
- none...
Colibri VF50 V1.0A (1N02G)
- 0x00000011
- 0x00610000
- 0x01000000
- none...
Vybrid Tower Rev J (1N02G)
- 0x00000011
- 0x00610000
- 0x01000000
- 0x410000c8
The ROM revision differs the most, so we would like to go with the
revision information from the ROM register 0x80.
Sanchayan Maity (2):
ARM: dts: vfxxx: Add OCOTP and OCROM nodes
soc: Add driver for Freescale Vybrid Platform
arch/arm/boot/dts/vfxxx.dtsi | 12 ++++
drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 10 +++
drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/soc/fsl/soc-vf610.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/soc-vf610.c
--
2.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/